About Us

Audio Sermons

Bible Courses

Bulletin Articles

Directions

Links

Sermons

Sermons In Series

 

Mormonism Examined (Part 1)

(Editor’s Note: Dillion Riecke has been studying with a person holding to the Mormon doctrine. He emailed me with his thoughts and asked for my help. Below is what he sent and some points that I added to the study (see italics). Hope this proves useful in your studies. – D.T.)


1. The whole concept of modern prophets and Joseph Smith, Jr. having a new revelation is completely contradictory to what the Bible says. In Revelation 22:18-19 it talks about modifying the book (although I'm unsure if it was just talking about the book of Revelation), and if it is referring to modifying any part of the Bible in adding or removing things (which makes sense that you shouldn't do that) then the idea that modern prophets past the new testament bringing about new information is utterly bogus and goes strictly against what the Bible says. Also, Galatians 1:6-8 talks directly about  preaching any other gospel other than what they, Paul and his companions, had preached (which was Jesus' new law), and since the Book of Mormon didn't come into existence until over a thousand years later, they can't be referring to it. Thus, this excludes the Book of Mormon from the gospel that they were preaching and therefore the Bible discredits such new prophecies and revelations.  

Man has never had the right to change the word of God. In addition to Revelation 22.18-19 we read in Deuteronomy 4.2 "You shall not add to the word which I commanded you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I commanded you." While Revelation 22.18-19 applies directly to the writings in Revelation the idea applies to all the word of God. No one  has the right to add to or subtract from God's word. This may lead to the question of how do we know if someone is adding to or revealing God’s word. Deuteronomy 18 tells us that a true prophet of God will always know future events while a false prophet will not. Therefore, if a person could foretell events then their message would be from God. If a person falsely foretold events then their message would be false. The reason we accept the writings of Ezekiel, Daniel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and other prophets in the Bible is because they correctly foretold the future and could forth tell the word of God.  

According to the Mormons the word of God was lost or perverted until Joseph Smith found the tablets of gold and translated the Book of Mormon. We are to believe that the Bible is the perverted word and the BOM (Book of Mormon) is really the word of God. Where are the tablets of gold that Joseph Smith found? What proofs do they offer that the Bible has been perverted? When was it perverted? It is easy to make such allegations, but where is the proof? In order to prove their claim, they will have to come up with earlier manuscripts of the Bible that teach  differently from what we currently have. Keep in mind that Jude 3 tells us to "contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints." Once for all means there will be no later day revelations. Once I pay off my car I don't  have to pay it off again. Their claims directly contradicts Jude 3. 2 Peter 1.3 "His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness." What more could Joseph Smith give us than what has already been given to us?  

The heart of the matter is the Mormons claim their book is a "later day revelation" of Jesus Christ. However, the Hebrew writer makes a point in Hebrews 9.16 that once the testator dies there can not be another testament. We know this to be true. Once a person dies, their testament becomes valid, but a dead person can not give a new will or testament. The Mormons want to give lip service to the Bible, but they really reject it as being from Christ. They say the BOM is another testament of Jesus, but they don't accept the first testament (The Bible).  

Here are some questions to ask a Mormon.

They claim that the BOM is the same as the Bible. If so then why do we have the BOM?  

If the Bible has been perverted, then why not just fix the Bible instead of give us a different revelation of Jesus Christ?  

The Law of Christ was ratified by His blood. What or whose blood was the BOM ratified by?

 2. The belief in Mormonism, that you can get baptized (acting as a proxy) for a dead person who was not baptized, thus saving them is completely insane. Does the Bible give us the authority to get baptized in someone's place while they're alive? No, I don't believe so. So why is that restriction lifted once they are dead? My logic is that we are here on this earth to prove ourselves worthy to be in Heaven by doing the things God has asked of us and it is our responsibility to do what we need to do to achieve that. (I'm not certain about this 100% but) I believe that doing what the Bible says (while very much required) is indirect in achieving salvation, as the point in actually doing that and the reason behind it and the person's own faith in doing what the Bible says is what's important; thus, it does no good to go through the motions of doing these things for someone else (even if they did believe). We are here on earth as a test of OUR soul and not a test of seeing if others want us to go to Heaven.

    This very concept is mentioned in 1 Corinthians. Here are a few translations of 1 Corinthians 15:29  

King James Version:
"Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?"

 New International Version:

"Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them?" 

New American Standard Bible:
"Otherwise, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them?"

- text from http://www.BibleGateway.com/ 

You make some really good points above. One person can not offer obedience to God on behalf of another. Ezekiel 18.20 "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteous of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be  upon himself." We can not give or transfer our righteousness to another person. Each of us will give account for what we have done in this body, 2 Corinthians 5.10.  

Mormons use 1 Corinthians 15 to prove their practice of "baptism for the dead." Verse 29 "Otherwise, what will they do who are baptized for the dead, if the dead do not rise at all? Why then are they baptized for the dead?" (NKJV). The context of this verse is very important. The Christians at Corinthian had been baptized in to Christ, 1 Corinthians 12.13. There were some that were now questioning the resurrection of Christ. Such lead Paul to make this statement, "For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins!" (1 Corinthians 15.16-17). The resurrection of Christ is the very cornerstone of Christianity. If He rose from the grave then we have hope in our resurrection. If he is still in the grave then we will likewise die and remain in the grave. Therefore, if you accept the idea that Jesus is still in the grave; then why be baptized into Him?! There would be no reason. That is the point Paul is making in 1 Corinthians 15.29. —more next week—

 Home Page